AMD Quad-Core Opteron (Barcelona)

The new quad-core Opteron from AMD is the first true (x86) quad-core processor that features one die with four cores. Barcelona is based on a 65nm fabrication process, and rumor has it late next year AMD will move to a 45nm process. More than just four cores on one die, the new quad-core Opteron features several micro-architectural changes from the previous dual-core Socket-F platform. Below are the main highlights of quad-core Opteron.

Independent Dynamic Core Technology

AMD has always been strong with their performance-per-watt numbers, and with this new technology AMD can alter the frequency of each core individually. This should allow AMD to more tightly control their power levels thus decreasing overall power consumption and lowering TCO.

AMD CoolCore Technology

This unique technology evaluates which parts of the die (cores/memory or both) are required by the application, and can cut power to unused transistor areas to reduce power consumption and lower heat generation.

SSE128

The previous generation Opteron had to use two clock cycles to execute 128-bit SSE operations. Barcelona can now execute 128-bit SSE operations in a single clock cycle.

2MB L3 Shared Cache

In order to keep up with multi-threaded applications, AMD added 2MB of L3 cache that all four cores share. The cache breakdown for the new Barcelona is as follows: 64KB L1 cache (64K each for data and instructions) and 512KB L2 cache per core, and then the 2MB L3 shared cache.

Drop-in to existing Socket-F

Barcelona is based on the previous generation Socket-F platform, allowing most modern Socket-F servers (with a BIOS update) to drop in a quad-core Barcelona part. We can attest to this fact, as our S3992 Tyan Board received a BIOS upgrade and was off to the races with Barcelona.


What's new with the Harpertown Xeon Quest Software Benchmark Factory
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jason Clark - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    Ross and I did not have 2.5Ghz, it was nearly impossible just getting ahold of 2.0GHz.... We'd run it if we had it :)
  • Regs - Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - link

    Hi Derek Johan De Gelas mentioned that had 2.5 GHz part in your tech labs. Can we expect a preview of that soon?
  • Regs - Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - link

    Whoops, I confused you Jason for Derek Wilson.
  • Viditor - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    Which stepping of Barcelona were you using (it wasn't in the test setup and has become an issue of late)

    Cheers
  • firewolfsm - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    This review seems biased. If you want to run only the 2GHz part at least calculate the performance per clock because it looks like Barcelona has Intel beat in a lot of the benchmarks. Meaning 2.5GHz would be much more competitive.
  • firewolfsm - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    Sorry for the double...
  • GlassHouse69 - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    Well. It looks like AMD wins. Money is everything. Oh sure, there will be some geek who will say, "Money is no object, only getting the workload done as fast as possible." that geek would be wrong. Amazing how this WOULDNT start a price war. 400 vs.... 2.5-3x that much? You could put four on a board and start rocking in the free world.

    Makes me happy about Phenom. Imagine a 190 dollar quad that isnt intel? something to buy finally.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now